Requirements matrix
For Vendor evaluation, we start by reviewing requirements matrix. We identify what already works and which decisions your team needs to make.
Compare suppliers against the job you need done.
Supplier comparisons are more useful when the criteria are explicit. We consider capability, support, running costs and the practical implications of changing supplier later.
0207 183 9270Supplier comparisons are more useful when the criteria are explicit. We consider capability, support, running costs and the practical implications of changing supplier later.
The best starting point is a clear understanding of the decision you need to make. We compare realistic options and leave you with priorities, assumptions and responsibilities that your team can use.

For Vendor evaluation, we start by reviewing requirements matrix. We identify what already works and which decisions your team needs to make.
We agree how capability review will fit the people and tools involved. Dependencies are reviewed before the implementation is scheduled.
We check contract questions in a realistic working journey. The result records any limitations and the person responsible for follow-up.
Start with the people involved and the task they need to complete. Real examples help separate essential requirements from assumptions and give the delivery team a useful brief.
Prepare the working detail for review, with time to ask questions and resolve assumptions.
Start with the people involved and the task they need to complete. Real examples help separate essential requirements from assumptions and give the delivery team a useful brief.
Explain the handover and confirm who owns the next change or request.
The requirements matrix stage provides the agreed starting information for capability review. The owner checks this step before the work moves on.
The capability review stage provides the agreed starting information for contract questions. The owner checks this step before the work moves on.
The contract questions stage provides the agreed starting information for exit considerations. The owner checks this step before the work moves on.
The exit considerations stage forms part of the final handover. The owner checks this step before the work moves on.
Discuss the real task, existing systems and constraints. Record what success looks like before choosing a solution.
Review the structure and agree the scope, responsibilities and acceptance examples. Set a realistic sequence for delivery.
Build the agreed work in reviewable stages. Check the important details with your team and explain decisions as they are made.
Test the finished journeys, agree the launch and explain ownership. Discuss ongoing support separately from the initial build.
The best starting point is a clear understanding of the decision you need to make. We compare realistic options and leave you with priorities, assumptions and responsibilities that your team can use.
Platform choices follow the requirements. We review existing accounts, data formats and supplier agreements before proposing replacements or additional subscriptions.
Access should match the task. Your business keeps ownership of its accounts and records.
Compare shortlisted suppliers using the same required capabilities and evidence. Review ownership, support, contract questions and data-export options so the business understands the implications of both joining and leaving.
Your project uses examples agreed with your team. This scenario explains the checks to consider; it is not a completed client case study.
We review access requirements and keep permissions aligned with the responsibilities of each role.
Important journeys are checked with realistic data and a range of expected and unexpected inputs.
The people using and maintaining the result are involved before handover, with time for questions and training.
Choose the level of work that fits your goal. We confirm the price after reviewing the requirements and list recurring and third-party costs separately.
You do not need a finished specification. A real example, a clear goal and someone who knows the current process are enough to begin.
Sample perspectives for this service. Verified client testimonials will replace these with permission.
“We wanted requirements matrix explained clearly, so everyone knew what the project needed to achieve.”
Business owner · sample perspective
“Having capability review agreed before delivery made it easier for our team to review the work and ask the right questions.”
Project lead · sample perspective
We start with requirements matrix, then agree what capability review needs to cover. A real example from your business helps us define the work accurately.
Your proposal sets out requirements matrix, capability review, contract questions, exit considerations. The handover records the agreed setup, the checks completed and the responsibilities that remain with your team.
We review the tools and access available before promising a connection. Where an integration is limited, we explain the options and any manual steps that remain.
We quote for the agreed deliverables, complexity and support needs. Hosting, subscriptions, advertising spend and third-party charges are identified separately.
We use realistic examples to check contract questions and exit considerations. Your team reviews the important journeys before the work is signed off.
We explain the handover and maintenance needs. Ongoing support is a separate agreed scope with clear responsibilities and a review schedule.
Tell us what you want to improve, what you use today and any deadline you need us to consider.