Crawl review
For Technical SEO audits, we start by reviewing crawl review. We identify what already works and which decisions your team needs to make.
Find the issues that make a useful site harder to discover.
A site can contain useful information and still be difficult for search engines to crawl or interpret. An audit looks at the technical issues and prioritises changes by their likely impact.
0207 183 9270A site can contain useful information and still be difficult for search engines to crawl or interpret. An audit looks at the technical issues and prioritises changes by their likely impact.
Useful search work joins technical health with content that answers real questions. We establish what can be measured and keep priorities focused on the pages and enquiries that matter to the business.

For Technical SEO audits, we start by reviewing crawl review. We identify what already works and which decisions your team needs to make.
We agree how indexing checks will fit the people and tools involved. Dependencies are reviewed before the implementation is scheduled.
We check site structure in a realistic working journey. The result records any limitations and the person responsible for follow-up.
Review the current requirements with the person who knows the work. Agree the boundaries and useful examples before delivery.
Prepare the working detail for review, with time to ask questions and resolve assumptions.
Check the agreed implementation against realistic tasks and record the result.
Understand how the work happens today and who is involved at each handoff. We compare practical improvements and record the decisions, responsibilities and next steps.
The crawl review stage provides the agreed starting information for indexing checks. The owner checks this step before the work moves on.
The indexing checks stage provides the agreed starting information for site structure. The owner checks this step before the work moves on.
The site structure stage provides the agreed starting information for priority fixes. The owner checks this step before the work moves on.
The priority fixes stage forms part of the final handover. The owner checks this step before the work moves on.
Discuss the real task, existing systems and constraints. Record what success looks like before choosing a solution.
Review the structure and agree the scope, responsibilities and acceptance examples. Set a realistic sequence for delivery.
Build the agreed work in reviewable stages. Check the important details with your team and explain decisions as they are made.
Test the finished journeys, agree the launch and explain ownership. Discuss ongoing support separately from the initial build.
Useful search work joins technical health with content that answers real questions. We establish what can be measured and keep priorities focused on the pages and enquiries that matter to the business.
Platform choices follow the requirements. We review existing accounts, data formats and supplier agreements before proposing replacements or additional subscriptions.
Access should match the task. Your business keeps ownership of its accounts and records.
Crawl an agreed group of pages and compare the HTML response with the rendered result. Check indexability, redirects, canonical targets and internal links, then prioritise findings by their effect on discovery and the customer journey.
Your project uses examples agreed with your team. This scenario explains the checks to consider; it is not a completed client case study.
We review access requirements and keep permissions aligned with the responsibilities of each role.
Important journeys are checked with realistic data and a range of expected and unexpected inputs.
The people using and maintaining the result are involved before handover, with time for questions and training.
Choose the level of work that fits your goal. We confirm the price after reviewing the requirements and list recurring and third-party costs separately.
You do not need a finished specification. A real example, a clear goal and someone who knows the current process are enough to begin.
Sample perspectives for this service. Verified client testimonials will replace these with permission.
“We wanted crawl review explained clearly, so everyone knew what the project needed to achieve.”
Business owner · sample perspective
“Having indexing checks agreed before delivery made it easier for our team to review the work and ask the right questions.”
Project lead · sample perspective
We start with crawl review, then agree what indexing checks needs to cover. A real example from your business helps us define the work accurately.
Your proposal sets out crawl review, indexing checks, site structure, priority fixes. The handover records the agreed setup, the checks completed and the responsibilities that remain with your team.
We review the tools and access available before promising a connection. Where an integration is limited, we explain the options and any manual steps that remain.
We quote for the agreed deliverables, complexity and support needs. Hosting, subscriptions, advertising spend and third-party charges are identified separately.
No. Rankings depend on competition, search engines and many factors outside one supplier’s control. We agree useful measures and report progress without promising a particular position.
We explain the handover and maintenance needs. Ongoing support is a separate agreed scope with clear responsibilities and a review schedule.
Tell us what you want to improve, what you use today and any deadline you need us to consider.