User requirements
For Scope & technology planning, we start by reviewing user requirements. We identify what already works and which decisions your team needs to make.
Agree what the project needs before choosing the stack.
The platform choice should follow the job the system needs to do. We define the required journeys and constraints, then compare technical options against those requirements.
0207 183 9270The platform choice should follow the job the system needs to do. We define the required journeys and constraints, then compare technical options against those requirements.
The best starting point is a clear understanding of the decision you need to make. We compare realistic options and leave you with priorities, assumptions and responsibilities that your team can use.

For Scope & technology planning, we start by reviewing user requirements. We identify what already works and which decisions your team needs to make.
We agree how technical options will fit the people and tools involved. Dependencies are reviewed before the implementation is scheduled.
We check delivery boundaries in a realistic working journey. The result records any limitations and the person responsible for follow-up.
Start with the people involved and the task they need to complete. Real examples help separate essential requirements from assumptions and give the delivery team a useful brief.
Compare the options against current needs and likely growth. We document the trade-offs, dependencies and operating responsibilities rather than choosing a tool because it is familiar.
Check the agreed implementation against realistic tasks and record the result.
Use examples from real work, including incomplete and unexpected inputs. The checks give your team a visible way to decide whether the result is ready and which issues still need attention.
The user requirements stage provides the agreed starting information for technical options. The owner checks this step before the work moves on.
The technical options stage provides the agreed starting information for delivery boundaries. The owner checks this step before the work moves on.
The delivery boundaries stage provides the agreed starting information for acceptance criteria. The owner checks this step before the work moves on.
The acceptance criteria stage forms part of the final handover. The owner checks this step before the work moves on.
Discuss the real task, existing systems and constraints. Record what success looks like before choosing a solution.
Review the structure and agree the scope, responsibilities and acceptance examples. Set a realistic sequence for delivery.
Build the agreed work in reviewable stages. Check the important details with your team and explain decisions as they are made.
Test the finished journeys, agree the launch and explain ownership. Discuss ongoing support separately from the initial build.
The best starting point is a clear understanding of the decision you need to make. We compare realistic options and leave you with priorities, assumptions and responsibilities that your team can use.
Platform choices follow the requirements. We review existing accounts, data formats and supplier agreements before proposing replacements or additional subscriptions.
Access should match the task. Your business keeps ownership of its accounts and records.
Turn a stakeholder’s request into clear users, boundaries and acceptance examples. Compare technical options against those requirements and record exclusions so a proposal can be reviewed without hidden assumptions.
Your project uses examples agreed with your team. This scenario explains the checks to consider; it is not a completed client case study.
We review access requirements and keep permissions aligned with the responsibilities of each role.
Important journeys are checked with realistic data and a range of expected and unexpected inputs.
The people using and maintaining the result are involved before handover, with time for questions and training.
Choose the level of work that fits your goal. We confirm the price after reviewing the requirements and list recurring and third-party costs separately.
You do not need a finished specification. A real example, a clear goal and someone who knows the current process are enough to begin.
Sample perspectives for this service. Verified client testimonials will replace these with permission.
“We wanted user requirements explained clearly, so everyone knew what the project needed to achieve.”
Business owner · sample perspective
“Having technical options agreed before delivery made it easier for our team to review the work and ask the right questions.”
Project lead · sample perspective
We start with user requirements, then agree what technical options needs to cover. A real example from your business helps us define the work accurately.
Your proposal sets out user requirements, technical options, delivery boundaries, acceptance criteria. The handover records the agreed setup, the checks completed and the responsibilities that remain with your team.
We review the tools and access available before promising a connection. Where an integration is limited, we explain the options and any manual steps that remain.
We quote for the agreed deliverables, complexity and support needs. Hosting, subscriptions, advertising spend and third-party charges are identified separately.
We use realistic examples to check delivery boundaries and acceptance criteria. Your team reviews the important journeys before the work is signed off.
We explain the handover and maintenance needs. Ongoing support is a separate agreed scope with clear responsibilities and a review schedule.
Tell us what you want to improve, what you use today and any deadline you need us to consider.