User roles
For Custom web applications, we start by reviewing user roles. We identify what already works and which decisions your team needs to make.
Replace awkward workarounds with a tool that fits.
If people keep moving information between spreadsheets, inboxes and disconnected tools, a custom application can give the work a clearer home. We begin with one complete user task.
0207 183 9270If people keep moving information between spreadsheets, inboxes and disconnected tools, a custom application can give the work a clearer home. We begin with one complete user task.
A useful application removes a real obstacle. We start with the people doing the work, the decisions they make and the information they need, then build the important journeys around that.

For Custom web applications, we start by reviewing user roles. We identify what already works and which decisions your team needs to make.
We agree how working journeys will fit the people and tools involved. Dependencies are reviewed before the implementation is scheduled.
We check application logic in a realistic working journey. The result records any limitations and the person responsible for follow-up.
Agree which records and actions each person can use. We check the boundaries across screens, searches and exports, rather than relying on a hidden button to protect information.
Show the important journey before production and review what people see at each step. We include loading, empty and error states so the design explains how the experience behaves.
Check the agreed implementation against realistic tasks and record the result.
Use examples from real work, including incomplete and unexpected inputs. The checks give your team a visible way to decide whether the result is ready and which issues still need attention.
The user roles stage provides the agreed starting information for working journeys. The owner checks this step before the work moves on.
The working journeys stage provides the agreed starting information for application logic. The owner checks this step before the work moves on.
The application logic stage provides the agreed starting information for acceptance testing. The owner checks this step before the work moves on.
The acceptance testing stage forms part of the final handover. The owner checks this step before the work moves on.
Discuss the real task, existing systems and constraints. Record what success looks like before choosing a solution.
Review the structure and agree the scope, responsibilities and acceptance examples. Set a realistic sequence for delivery.
Build the agreed work in reviewable stages. Check the important details with your team and explain decisions as they are made.
Test the finished journeys, agree the launch and explain ownership. Discuss ongoing support separately from the initial build.
A useful application removes a real obstacle. We start with the people doing the work, the decisions they make and the information they need, then build the important journeys around that.
Platform choices follow the requirements. We review existing accounts, data formats and supplier agreements before proposing replacements or additional subscriptions.
Access should match the task. Your business keeps ownership of its accounts and records.
Follow one complete business task from entry to approval using two different user roles. Check validation, saved records and permission boundaries, including what happens when the connection fails during submission.
Your project uses examples agreed with your team. This scenario explains the checks to consider; it is not a completed client case study.
We review access requirements and keep permissions aligned with the responsibilities of each role.
Important journeys are checked with realistic data and a range of expected and unexpected inputs.
The people using and maintaining the result are involved before handover, with time for questions and training.
Choose the level of work that fits your goal. We confirm the price after reviewing the requirements and list recurring and third-party costs separately.
You do not need a finished specification. A real example, a clear goal and someone who knows the current process are enough to begin.
Sample perspectives for this service. Verified client testimonials will replace these with permission.
“We wanted user roles explained clearly, so everyone knew what the project needed to achieve.”
Business owner · sample perspective
“Having working journeys agreed before delivery made it easier for our team to review the work and ask the right questions.”
Project lead · sample perspective
We start with user roles, then agree what working journeys needs to cover. A real example from your business helps us define the work accurately.
Your proposal sets out user roles, working journeys, application logic, acceptance testing. The handover records the agreed setup, the checks completed and the responsibilities that remain with your team.
We review the tools and access available before promising a connection. Where an integration is limited, we explain the options and any manual steps that remain.
We quote for the agreed deliverables, complexity and support needs. Hosting, subscriptions, advertising spend and third-party charges are identified separately.
We use realistic examples to check application logic and acceptance testing. Your team reviews the important journeys before the work is signed off.
We explain the handover and maintenance needs. Ongoing support is a separate agreed scope with clear responsibilities and a review schedule.
Tell us what you want to improve, what you use today and any deadline you need us to consider.